
>>124681 #
It's not that far off. If you can get the face markings right, the rest would be okay. Eyes are a bit too human though.
>realizing just now that animaika after v23 regressed in terms of text rendering
wuut duuh fuuuukk
>>124690 #
>regressed
How can you tell? It's all probabilistic and text is already hard to render normally.
>>124693 #
certain words turn the entire sentence into complete sdxl tier gibberish, were v23 seems fine but always duplicates a specific letter in the word.
that said some words are just completely impossible, the word spiritually in v23 is gibberish, after that version it corrupts the whole sentence lol
im not surprised though, this is a big finetune on top of a model that's not even finished training. this scene moves way too fast, people gotta respect the time it takes to train a big ass dataset. can't have pony/illustrious models coming out every year.

>>124686 #
>If you can get the face markings right
Yes that's the hard part I'm talking about
>>124694 #
>AI refuses to generate the word spiritually
How peculiar

Yeah it's not possible without a LoRa
But I atleast learned a little bit about modifying an input image with paint and the image weights that work
>>125117 #
I only have 8gb Vram but it's probably 15-30 seconds per gen, slightly quicker with an input image, just a lot of trial and error with the prompt trying different words
>>125116 #
At least the eyes are cute. How long does it take you to gen one of those? Do you make a few and pick the best one?

>>125117 #
With a less niche character it usually only takes about 2 to 5 tries to get something good but it struggles differentiating the markings with her hair, plus it's kind of hard to describe them idk
If I made a LoRa it would be no problem, but there's also not a ton of pics of her to use so that would probably require generating/editing additional images to add to the data set
None of my models will do Re-I from Ergo Proxy... how am I supposed to fap?

Anima preview 3 came out days ago, i'm just now getting to it. Seems like there's more hype around this release than the previous, which seems to imply more people found Anima in all this time. Nice.
Hopefully next release fixes all the upscaling problems so i don't need that 2048pix lora anymore.

everything from v2 may need to be retrained for v3, even though people seem to be speculating the opposite. Loras rape the shit out of text capability, which seems to have improved with the new version.
also issues like picrel seem to crop up with these loras, the text boxes.

stole this from the 4/g/ animu thread awhile ago
back before anima
wish it could do her without a LoRa...I believe in evil waifu supremacy>>128133 #>Anima preview 3 came out days agodownloading it nowI suck at prompting so I probably won't notice a differencebut it will give me an excuse to post some slop
>>128728 #
preview 3 seems very promising, improvements in a few areas and with all the hype i think people are gonna be making some neat stuff.i don't think i have any evil waifus unless you count early Ayane from DOA

>>128857 #
>God, as in her lesbian GF
we'll see if she lives up to the sterotype and commits domestic abuse in the new movie I guess
for now thoughI don't think she's an 'evil' waifu, just a dark type pokemon
>>128821 #
>>128823 #
>>128857 #
>>128859 #
it just now occurred to me that none of this is even a.i, are you sure you're in the right BOARD?
correcting my newfaggotry on the site name and posts non-ai on the ai thread what are you dooiingg buudddeeee

>>128862 #
There are plenty of APIs you can use to fit in with us, sillya
Before local I was using pixAI, which is basically where I learned how to prompt and mess with image settings
But you can also just go there to steal media like I do now

>>128873 #
For now I'd rather be lazy and collect stuff from anons. I could dump the old glif memes made before your time for my next couple of posts though.

>>128878 #
again, this is the ai thread
but o-okay
>>128880 #
oh, I actually think I remember when this was a thing then, nvm then carry on

>>150594 #
I should really study how to make better slop
now that you mention it
>took like 5 tries with an API to edit this properly